Commentary: We have to look beyond the hardware to determine whether to recommend a product or not.
I'm a product reviewer. And whether I'm testing out a thermostat,
a spin bike or
a security
camera, I'm full of questions -- and those questions always start
with the hardware. CNET has published countless articles detailing
exactly how we test
products, but here are some general thoughts that immediately
come
to my mind as a smart home gadget
tester:
1. What's the installation like? Was it easy or hard? Why specifically?
2. Is the app streamlined or clunky? Does it enhance (or at
least not impede) using this product? How?
3. Is the device well designed? Will it likely hold up over
time? Are any parts fiddly?
4. Does the product itself do what it claims to do? Were there
any surprises? What, exactly?
5. How does this model compare to others from competitors? Is
this the "best" one?
6. Does it work with other smart home products, including voice
assistants? Are the integrations helpful?
Of course, the questions shift depending on the exact
product, but you get the idea. I receive a product, try out the product -- and
then tell you all about it.
With privacy and
security issues now the norm in consumer tech, there are new
considerations. What happens, for instance, when a product performs well, but
you have a hard time recommending it because of genuine
concern about a company's policies?
Smart home device maker Ring has been one of
my biggest challenges as a product reviewer to date. It certainly isn't
alone: Facebook, I'm
looking at you. But testing Ring doorbells and security cameras have
raised so many additional questions for me about a reviewer's role in
recommending -- or not recommending -- a product.
Please do not enter any spam link in the comment box.